SIGNAL IDUNA Bauspar review 2026
How good is SIGNAL IDUNA Bauspar really?
SIGNAL IDUNA Bauspar AG, based in Hamburg, has belonged to the SIGNAL IDUNA Gruppe since 1930 and is supervised by BaFin. We rated the provider under our building savings methodology, looking separately at the savings phase, loan terms and fees. The basis is the publicly available tariff documents for the F30, F40 and F50 variants (as of 09/2026).
Highlights of our SIGNAL IDUNA Bauspar review
- SIGNAL IDUNA Bauspar scores 78/100 points in our rating.
- Very low loan interest: in the F50 variant, the nominal borrowing rate (Sollzins) is 1.78 percent, and on 01.07.2025 the borrowing rates of the F30 and F50 variants were each cut by 0.30 percentage points.
- The credit interest of up to 0.70 percent in the F40 variant is above what many building societies pay in the savings phase.
- The arrangement fee of 1.0 percent of the building savings sum (alternatively 1.6 percent with different terms) and a €15 service fee a year cost points in the Costs chapter.
Table of contents
1 Costs
2 Loan terms
3 Savings phase
4 Allocation & flexibility
5 State support
6 Security & service
Pros & cons at a glance
Pros
- Very low loan interest from a 1.78 percent borrowing rate in the F50 variant
- Borrowing rates of the F30 and F50 variants cut by 0.30 percentage points each on 01.07.2025
- Credit interest of up to 0.70 percent in the savings phase
- No loan fee and no premium on allocation, special repayment free at any time
- Full state support including Wohn-Riester and VL
Cons
- Arrangement fee of 1.0 percent of the building savings sum, in the alternative variant even 1.6 percent
- Service fee of €15 a year in the savings phase
- Regular savings instalment of 5.00 per mille of the building savings sum per month is comparatively high
- No public information on reduction and splitting of the building savings sum
Conclusion: SIGNAL IDUNA Bauspar review
SIGNAL IDUNA Bauspar is convincing mainly where it counts in building savings: guaranteed loan interest rates and flexibility in the loan phase. The arrangement fee and the annual service fee noticeably weigh on the result in the Costs chapter. Anyone who actually uses the contract for financing gets a good overall package here – as a pure savings investment it is not worthwhile.
What is your experience with SIGNAL IDUNA Bauspar? Feel free to share it with other readers.
Read SIGNAL IDUNA Bauspar experiences